A Softer Formalism


Peter L. Strauss

Responding to John F. Manning, Separation of Powers as Ordinary Interpretation, 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1939 (2011)

In this response to Professor John Manning’s Separation of Powers as Ordinary Interpretation, Professor Peter Strauss argues for a more nuanced understanding of functionalism and textualism, the schools that serve as the poles of Professor Manning’s middle-ground approach. Professor Strauss also suggests that Professor Manning could go farther in observing the influence that the details of the Constitution’s text might have on interpretations of the President’s Article II authority.

124 Harv. L. Rev. F. 55 (2011) | DOWNLOAD PDF

Online Forum


Responding to Neal Kumar Katyal, Stochastic Constraint, 126 Harv. L. Rev. 990 (2013)

A Reply to Professor Katyal

Jack Goldsmith


Responding to David A. Strauss, Not Unwritten, After All?, 126 Harv. L. Rev. 1532 (2013)

American Constitutionalism — Written, Unwritten, and Living

Akhil Reed Amar


Reaction

Judicial Review of Targeted Killings

Jameel Jaffer


Reaction

Planning Responses and Defining Attacks in Cyberspace

Evan F. Kohlmann and Rodrigo Bijou



Reaction

Cyberdeterrence

Robert F. Turner


Reaction

Presidential Combat Against Climate Change

Richard J. Lazarus





Harvard Law Review
Gannett House
1511 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02138

Editorial Office:
617-495-7889
617-496-5053 (fax)

Business Office:
617-495-4650
617-495-2748 (fax)