Orphan Business Models: Toward a New Form of Intellectual Property

Article by Michael Abramowicz

Drug companies will often have insufficient incentives to undertake clinical testing on drugs ineligible for patent protection. The Orphan Drug Act combats this problem by providing a limited term of exclusivity to companies willing to shepherd a drug through FDA approval. This strategy is a form of intellectual property protection that might be applicable in many contexts beyond drugs, but the literature has not previously addressed the design and potential scope of such protection. Sometimes, no company will pursue a risky business model even when experimentation with that business model would increase expected social welfare, because other companies would free ride on information from the experiment. The Supreme Court’s recent holding in Bilski v. Kappos may provide a basis for incorporating such concerns into patent law, but targeted exclusivity rights for orphan business models may provide a better tailored solution. Such rights should be awarded to the company that agrees to the shortest exclusivity term, and a decentralized bonding mechanism can further reduce the risk of unnecessary protection. This Article identifies a number of contexts in which orphan business model protections might be desirable and also considers the possibility of using exclusive rights to foster legal experimentation.

124 Harv. L. Rev. 1362 (2011) | DOWNLOAD PDF | LEXIS NEXIS | WESTLAW



MORE FROM THIS ISSUE

IN MEMORIAM: In Memoriam: Benjamin Kaplan

ARTICLE: Information Acquisition and Institutional Design

NOTE: Permitting Private Initiation of Criminal Contempt Proceedings

NOTE: A Chevron for the House and Senate: Deferring to Post-Enactment Congressional Resolutions that Interpret Ambiguous Statutes

NOTE: Restoring Electoral Equilibrium in the Wake of Constitutionalized Campaign Finance

NOTE: Rethinking the Boundaries of the Sixth Amendment Right to Choice of Counsel

RECENT CASE: D.C. Circuit Upholds EPA Superfund Authority to Issue Cleanup Orders Reviewable Only Under Threat of Penalty. — General Electric Co. v. Jackson, 610 F.3d 110 (D.C. Cir. 2010).

RECENT CASE: Third Circuit Allows Government to Acquire Cell Phone Data Without Probable Cause. — In re The Application of the United States for an Order Directing a Provider of Electronic Communication Service to Disclose Records to the Government, 620 F.3d 304 (3d Cir. 2010).

RECENT CASE: Ninth Circuit Holds that Excluding Men from Supervisory Positions in Women's Prison Violates Title VII. — Breiner v. Nevada Department of Corrections, 610 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2010).

RECENT CASE: Nevada Supreme Court Reverses Conviction on the Basis of Spillover Prejudice. — Stewart v. State, No. 53100, 2010 WL 4226456 (Nev. Oct. 22, 2010).

RECENT REGULATION: Librarian of Congress Exempts University Professors and Film Students from DMCA Anticircumvention Provisions. — Exemption to Prohibition on Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems for Access Control Technologies, 75 Fed. Reg. 43,825 (July 27, 2010) (to be codified at 37 C.F.R. pt. 201).

RECENT PUBLICATIONS: Recent Publications


Harvard Law Review
Gannett House
1511 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02138

Editorial Office:
617-495-7889
617-496-5053 (fax)

Business Office:
617-495-4650
617-495-2748 (fax)