The Ineligibility Clause's Lost History: Presidential Patronage and Congress, 1787—1850
123 Harv. L. Rev. 1727 (2010) |
RESPONSE TO THIS ARTICLE
MORE FROM THIS ISSUE
ARTICLE: Bundling and Entrenchment
2009 OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES LECTURES: Dignity and Defamation: The Visibility of Hate
BOOK REVIEW: Cause Lawyering for People with Disabilities
NOTE: The Pakistani Lawyers' Movement and the Popular Currency of Judicial Power
NOTE: Overbreadth and Listeners' Rights
RECENT CASE: Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Recognizes Cause of Action for Medical Monitoring of Tobacco Users. —
Donovan v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
, 914 N.E.2d 891 (Mass. 2009).
RECENT CASE: Third Circuit Strikes Down Prophylactic Regulations Governing Speech Surrounding Health Care Facilities Providing Abortions. —
Brown v. City of Pittsburgh
, 586 F.3d 263 (3d Cir. 2009).
RECENT CASE: Second Circuit Holds that Alleged Victim of Extraordinary Rendition Did Not State a
Arar v. Ashcroft
, 585 F.3d 559 (2d Cir. 2009) (en banc).
RECENT CASE: Tenth Circuit Holds that a Defendant Is Prejudiced When His Lawyer's Deficient Performance Leads Him To Forego a Plea Bargain and Face a Fair Trial. —
Williams v. Jones
, 571 F.3d 1086 (10th Cir. 2009) (per curiam).
RECENT PROPOSED LEGISLATION: Congress Considers Bill To Prohibit Employment Discrimination on the Basis of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. — Employment Nondiscrimination Act of 2009, H.R. 3017, 111th Cong. (2009).
RECENT PUBLICATIONS: Recent Publications
FORUM & RESPONSES
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
HLR ON TWITTER
Harvard Law Review
1511 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02138
Copyright © 2009-2013 Harvard Law Review