First Circuit Adopts Plain Meaning of Requirement that Plaintiffs Give Government Their Information Before Filing Suit. — United States ex rel. Duxbury v. Ortho Biotech Products, L.P., 579 F.3d 13 (1st Cir. 2009).

123 Harv. L. Rev. 1361 (2010) | DOWNLOAD PDF | LEXIS NEXIS | WESTLAW

RESPONSE TO THIS ARTICLE

MORE FROM THIS ISSUE

ARTICLE: Economic Crisis and the Rise of Judicial Elections and Judicial Review

ARTICLE: Shareholder Opportunism in a World of Risky Debt

ESSAY: Inducing Moral Deliberation: On the Occasional Virtues of Fog

DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW: Developments in the Law – State Action and the Public/Private Distinction

NOTE: The Single Publication Rule and Online Copyright: Tensions Between Broadcast, Licensing, and Defamation Law

NOTE: Designing a Prisoner Reentry System Hardwired To Manage Disputes

RECENT CASE: Ninth Circuit Requires Case-by-Case Prudential Analysis of Exhaustion of Local Remedies in Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Suits. — Cassirer v. Kingdom of Spain, 580 F.3d 1048 (9th Cir. 2009).

RECENT CASE: Ninth Circuit Strikes Down California Law Extending Statute of Limitations for the Recovery of Holocaust-Era Artwork. — Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena, No. 07-56691, 2010 WL 114959 (9th Cir. Jan 14, 2010).

Harvard Law Review
Gannett House
1511 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02138

Editorial Office:
617-495-7889
617-496-5053 (fax)

Business Office:
617-495-4650
617-495-2748 (fax)