First Circuit Adopts Plain Meaning of Requirement that Plaintiffs Give Government Their Information Before Filing Suit. —
United States ex rel. Duxbury v. Ortho Biotech Products, L.P.
, 579 F.3d 13 (1st Cir. 2009).
123 Harv. L. Rev. 1361 (2010) |
RESPONSE TO THIS ARTICLE
MORE FROM THIS ISSUE
ARTICLE: Economic Crisis and the Rise of Judicial Elections and Judicial Review
ARTICLE: Shareholder Opportunism in a World of Risky Debt
ESSAY: Inducing Moral Deliberation: On the Occasional Virtues of Fog
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW: Developments in the Law – State Action and the Public/Private Distinction
NOTE: The Single Publication Rule and Online Copyright: Tensions Between Broadcast, Licensing, and Defamation Law
NOTE: Designing a Prisoner Reentry System Hardwired To Manage Disputes
RECENT CASE: Ninth Circuit Requires Case-by-Case Prudential Analysis of Exhaustion of Local Remedies in Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Suits. —
Cassirer v. Kingdom of Spain
, 580 F.3d 1048 (9th Cir. 2009).
RECENT CASE: Ninth Circuit Strikes Down California Law Extending Statute of Limitations for the Recovery of Holocaust-Era Artwork. —
Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena
, No. 07-56691, 2010 WL 114959 (9th Cir. Jan 14, 2010).
FORUM & RESPONSES
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
HLR ON TWITTER
Harvard Law Review
1511 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02138
Copyright © 2009-2013 Harvard Law Review