The Possibilities and Limitations of Privatization

Book Review by Edward Rubin

GOVERNMENT BY CONTRACT: OUTSOURCING AND AMERICAN DEMOCRACY. Edited by Jody Freeman and Martha Minow. Cam-bridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 2009. Pp. viii, 528. $49.95.

This excellent collection of essays arrives when the debate about privatization is already well advanced. Beginning largely during the 1970s, but accelerating in response to the second Bush Administration’s unalloyed enthusiasm for privatization, the scholarly literature on privatization is now voluminous. In fact, a number of the contributors to this volume have already written books or extensive articles about the topic. This is an advantage. It means not only that the contributors are extremely knowledgeable, but also that they have moved past the overheated enthusiasm or instinctive horror with which the debate began to more modulated and informed positions. They can therefore enter into a sustained, constructive dialogue with each other that constitutes a further virtue of Government by Contract. In all too many edited volumes, the contributors talk past each other; these contributors have read one another’s work, taken it seriously, and responded in ways that deepen the debate. The result is a book that will be extremely useful for readers who are new to the topic and want to familiarize themselves with its essential facts and basic issues, and equally useful for those who have been following the controversy and want to remain up to date with its most recent ramifications. In other words, if you have any interest in privatization, you should read this book. And, as Freeman and Minow argue in the Introduction, if you do not have any interest in privatization, you should develop one.



123 Harv. L. Rev. 890 (2010) | DOWNLOAD PDF | LEXIS NEXIS | WESTLAW



MORE FROM THIS ISSUE

ARTICLE: Intellectual Property Law and the Sumptuary Code

NOTE: Prosecutorial Power and the Legitimacy of the Military Justice System

NOTE: Badging: Section 230 Immunity in a Web 2.0 World

RECENT CASE: En Banc Ninth Circuit Holds that the Government Should Waive Reliance on Plain View Doctrine in Digital Contexts. — United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc., 579 F.3d 989 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc).

RECENT CASE: Maryland Court of Appeals Sets Out Process Required Before Court May Compel Identification of Anonymous Internet Defendants. — Independent Newspapers, Inc. v. Brodie, 966 A.2d 432 (Md. 2009).

NOTE: Making Ballot Initiatives Work: Some Assembly Required

RECENT CASE: Fifth Circuit Equally Divides on Decision To Uphold Judgment Against District Attorney's Office for Withholding Exculpatory Evidence. — Thompson v. Connick, 578 F.3d 293 (5th Cir. 2009) (en banc).

RECENT CASE: Third Circuit Issues Split Decision in Case Involving Gay Man's Harassment Claims. — Prowel v. Wise Business Forms, Inc., No. 07-3997, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19350 (3d Cir. Aug. 28, 2009).

RECENT CASE: Fourth Circuit Upholds Award of Punitive but Not Statutory Damages. — Van Alstyne v. Electronic Scriptorium, Ltd., 560 F.3d 199 (4th Cir. 2009).

RECENT CASE: Ninth Circuit Holds Montana Election Contribution Disclosure Requirements Unconstitutional as Applied to De Minimis Contributions. — Canyon Ferry Road Baptist Church of East Helena, Inc. v. Unsworth, 556 F.3d 1021 (9th Cir. 2009).

RECENT SIGNING STATEMENT: President Obama Issues First Constitutional Signing Statement, Declares Appropriations Bill Provisions Unenforceable. — Statement on Signing the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009, Daily Comp. Pres. Doc. No. DCPD200900145 (Mar. 11, 2009).

RECENT PUBLICATIONS: Recent Publications


Harvard Law Review
Gannett House
1511 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02138

Editorial Office:
617-495-7889
617-496-5053 (fax)

Business Office:
617-495-4650
617-495-2748 (fax)