California Superior Court Holds That the Knock-and-Announce Requirement Is Applicable When an Absent Third Party Has Consented to Search. — People v. West, No. CC633123 (Cal. Super. Ct. Aug. 9, 2006).

120 Harv. L. Rev. 836 (2007) | DOWNLOAD PDF | LEXIS NEXIS | WESTLAW

MORE FROM THIS ISSUE

ARTICLE: The Divergence of Contract and Promise

ARTICLE: Precontractual Liability and Preliminary Agreements

BOOK REVIEW: Anglo-American Empire and the Crisis of the Legal Frame (Will the Real British Empire Please Stand Up?)

NOTE: Federal Funding for Newcomer Schools: A Bipartisan Immigrant Education Initiative

RECENT CASE: District Court Holds That Recipients of Government Leaks Who Disclose Information "Related to the National Defense" May Be Prosecuted Under the Espionage Act. — United States v. Rosen, 445 F. Supp. 2d 602 (E.D. Va. 2006).

RECENT CASE: Ninth Circuit Holds That "Involuntary" Conduct Cannot Be Punished. — Jones v. City of Los Angeles, 444 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2006).

RECENT CASE: Louisiana Supreme Court Permits Retroactive Extension of Prescriptive Period in Insurance Contracts. — State v. All Property & Casualty Insurance Carriers, 937 So. 2d 313 (La. 2006).

RECENT CASE: First Circuit Holds That Trading Drugs for Guns Constitutes "Use" of a Gun for Purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 924(C). — United States v. Cotto, 456 F.3d 25 (1st Cir. 2006).

RECENT CASE: D.C. Circuit Holds Claims of Harms to Native Inhabitants of the British Indian Ocean Territory Caused by the Construction of a U.S. Military Base Nonjusticiable. — Bancoult v. McNamara, 445 F.3d 427 (D.C. Cir. 2006).

RECENT PUBLICATIONS: Recent Publications

Harvard Law Review
Gannett House
1511 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02138

Editorial Office:
617-495-7889
617-496-5053 (fax)

Business Office:
617-495-4650
617-495-2748 (fax)