Ninth Circuit Holds That Women Can Be Fired for Refusing to Wear Makeup. —
Jespersen v. Harrah’s Operating Co.
, 444 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir. 2006) (en banc).
120 Harv. L. Rev. 651 (2006) |
MORE FROM THIS ISSUE
ARTICLE: Creating an American Property Law: Alienability and Its Limits in American History
ARTICLE: Legal Origins, Politics, and Modern Stock Markets
ARTICLE: The Strategic Substitution Effect: Textual Plausibility, Procedural Formality, and Judicial Review of Agency Statutory Interpretations
NOTE: Guiding Regulatory Reform in Reproduction and Genetics
NOTE: Context-Sensitive Deference to Presidential Signing Statements
BOOK NOTE: The Relevance and Irrelevance of the Founders
RECENT CASE: Southern District of New York Rebuffs New York Attorney General's Bid to Regulate National Banks. —
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency v. Spitzer
, 396 F. Supp. 2d 383 (S.D.N.Y. 2005).
RECENT CASE: Second Circuit Holds New York City Subway Searches Constitutional Under Special Needs Doctrine. — MacWade v. Kelly, 460 F.3d 260 (2d Cir. 2006).
RECENT CASE: Ohio Supreme Court Holds That Economic Development Cannot by Itself Satisfy the Public Use Limitation of the Ohio Constitution. —
City of Norwood v. Horney
, 853 N.E.2d 1115 (Ohio 2006).
RECENT PUBLICATIONS: Recent Publications
FORUM & RESPONSES
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
HLR ON TWITTER
Harvard Law Review
1511 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02138
Copyright © 2009-2014 Harvard Law Review