Harvard Law Review - Harvard Law Review Home Page

Langdell

Harvard Law Review
Gannett House
1511 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02138

Editorial Office:
617-495-7889
617-496-5053 (fax)

Business Office:
617-495-4650
617-495-2748 (fax)

Current Issue

Vol. 119 · March 2006 · No. 5

A TRIBUTE TO JUSTICE SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Justice Stephen G. Breyer
Ruth V. McGregor Glen D. Nager Kathleen M. Sullivan
Afterword by Craig Joyce
ARTICLES
JUDICIALLY MANAGEABLE STANDARDS AND CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING	Richard H. Fallon, Jr.
LAW AND THE RISE OF THE FIRM	Henry Hansmann, Reinier Kraakman, and Richard Squire
BOOK REVIEW
RATIONALISM AND REVISIONISM IN INTERNATIONAL LAW	Oona A. Hathaway and Ariel N. Lavinbuk

NOTES
A Law and Economics Look at Contracts Against Public Policy
When Do Policy Innovations Spread? Lessons for Advocates of Lesson-Drawing
"Recoding" and the Derivative Works Entitlement: Addressing the First Amendment Challenge
The Plaintiff as Person: Cause Lawyering, Human Subject Research, and the Secret Agent Problem
Implementing Brand X: What Counts as a Step One Holding?
Beyond "Independent" Directors: A Functional Approach to Board Independence
An Interstate Process Perspective on Political Gerrymandering
RECENT CASES
Second Circuit Finds National Bank Operating Subsidiary Exempted from State Law. — Wachovia Bank v. Burke, 414 F.3d 305 (2d Cir. 2005).
D.C. Circuit Upholds the Constitutionality of Military Commissions for Guantánamo Bay Detainees. — Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 415 F.3d 33 (D.C. Cir.), cert. granted, 126 S. Ct. 622 (2005).
California Supreme Court Holds Child Support Provisions of Its Uniform Parentage Act Applicable to Same-Sex Couples. — Elisa B. v. Superior Court, 117 P.3d 660 (Cal. 2005).
First Circuit Holds That Customary International Law Does Not Obligate the United States To Grant the Presidential Vote to Puerto Rican Residents. — Igartúa–de la Rosa v. United States (Igartúa III), 417 F.3d 145 (1st Cir. 2005) (en banc).
Ninth Circuit Holds That Search of Pretrial Releasee Is Unconstitutional Despite Releasee's Consent. — United States v. Scott, 424 F.3d 888 (9th Cir. 2005).
RECENT PUBLICATIONS Full Text

To view Harvard Law Review content online you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader.
Download it here for free!

© 2006 The Harvard Law Review Association
webmaster@harvardlawreview.org

THE FORUM

NEW RESPONSES

Responding to Judicially Manageable Standards and Constitutional Meaning:

Aspirational Rights and the Two-Output Thesis
- Mitchell N. Berman

The Pragmatist's View of Constitutional Implementation and Constitutional Meaning
- Roderick M. Hills,Jr.

Aspiration and Underenforcement
- Kermit Roosevelt III

Responding to Law and the Rise of the Firm:

Entity Shielding and the Development of Business Forms: A Comparative Perspective
- Naomi R. Lamoreaux and Jean-Laurent Rosenthal

About the Forum

RSS feed

Join the Harvard Law Review mailing list.